Post by account_disabled on Mar 11, 2024 0:11:45 GMT -5
Television sets, VCRs, DVDs and sound systems are unseizable when furnishing the residence, according to the understanding of Minister Sidnei Beneti, of the Superior Court of Justice. When analyzing the complaint filed against the decision of the nd Appeal Panel of Mato Grosso do Sul, in the opposite sense, the minister decided to suspend the progress of all processes in progress in the Special Civil Courts of the country in which the unseizability of the devices that protect the property is being discussed. family's.
The minister's determination is valid until the final judgment of the Complaint filed against the understanding of the nd Appeal Panel of Mato Grosso do Sul, which pawned household appliances to pay off debts. In the decision, the minister opened a -day period for those interested in the complaint action to express themselves.
The Complaint's arguments raise the divergence between Austria Phone Numbers List the thesis adopted by the Appeal Panel and the jurisprudence of the STJ. The Appeal Panel considered that unseizable assets are only those “essential to the life of the debtor” and that Law ,/, which deals with the unseizability of family assets, does not attribute unseizability to expendable, superfluous and comforting assets in the debtor's life. .
However, Minister Sidnei Beneti clarified that the STJ's jurisprudence only excludes transport vehicles, works of art and sumptuous adornments. Television, VCR, DVDs and sound, utilities of today's modern life, cannot be seized for furnishing the residence. He recognized the plausibility of the right invoked in the Complaint and the risk of damage that would be difficult to repair. With information from the STJ Editorial and Press Coordination.
The minister's determination is valid until the final judgment of the Complaint filed against the understanding of the nd Appeal Panel of Mato Grosso do Sul, which pawned household appliances to pay off debts. In the decision, the minister opened a -day period for those interested in the complaint action to express themselves.
The Complaint's arguments raise the divergence between Austria Phone Numbers List the thesis adopted by the Appeal Panel and the jurisprudence of the STJ. The Appeal Panel considered that unseizable assets are only those “essential to the life of the debtor” and that Law ,/, which deals with the unseizability of family assets, does not attribute unseizability to expendable, superfluous and comforting assets in the debtor's life. .
However, Minister Sidnei Beneti clarified that the STJ's jurisprudence only excludes transport vehicles, works of art and sumptuous adornments. Television, VCR, DVDs and sound, utilities of today's modern life, cannot be seized for furnishing the residence. He recognized the plausibility of the right invoked in the Complaint and the risk of damage that would be difficult to repair. With information from the STJ Editorial and Press Coordination.