Post by account_disabled on Feb 22, 2024 1:13:42 GMT -5
In another example of the unusual nature of the negotiation of the Omnibus law promoted by Javier Milei, Miguel Ángel Pichetto, head of the We Make Federal Coalition bank , which brings together 23 deputies and is key to the aspirations of the ruling party, says that he was surprised due to the decision of the Executive Branch to withdraw the fiscal chapter of the initiative because there was consensus to advance on some issues, such as money laundering and moratorium. Interviewed by Clarín This Sunday, Pichetto spoke about Milei 's "coercive schemes" , described the omnibus law as "excess" due to the amount of matters it contains and questioned the Minister of Economy, Luis Caputo and the presidential advisor Federico Sturzenegger whom he calls "failure". The following is a summary of the interview.
How did you take the government's announcement to withdraw the fiscal chapter of the Omnibus Law? A little with surprise. There were issues on which we Switzerland Mobile Number List had made progress. Today I see some articles that mention that we did not agree with the money laundering, the moratorium, the emergencies and the delegations and that entire chapter was advanced. There was support, in addition to personal assets, but it is a decision that the Government made and without a doubt the fiscal chapter is outside the debate of the law. On Tuesday our desire is to meet and work at the premises to incorporate some modifications, but in general terms we support the legal ruling.
And on the fiscal issue we had a dissidence based on a vision of the country. Taxing export sectors is not the way. The conditions must be created so that it can export strongly. But we were open to discussing it on the premises. But then why did the Executive withdraw it? It is a decision that should be asked to the Government. The Government sensed that it could lose the chapter on agricultural withholdings, which was probably the most critical axis.
And perhaps he considered that he should not discuss the entire fiscal and tax issue.And he withdraws it, along with the Income Tax Law. To be clear, Argentina needs dialogue, a nation-province dialogue, where balance and fiscal order are taken into account, the issues that the national government needs to stabilize the economy and the provinces also need fiscal and economic predictability. that the national government must guarantee so that the provinces can function. That dialogue seems still pending to me. From what he says, there was room to move forward with the law, except with the withholdings.
How did you take the government's announcement to withdraw the fiscal chapter of the Omnibus Law? A little with surprise. There were issues on which we Switzerland Mobile Number List had made progress. Today I see some articles that mention that we did not agree with the money laundering, the moratorium, the emergencies and the delegations and that entire chapter was advanced. There was support, in addition to personal assets, but it is a decision that the Government made and without a doubt the fiscal chapter is outside the debate of the law. On Tuesday our desire is to meet and work at the premises to incorporate some modifications, but in general terms we support the legal ruling.
And on the fiscal issue we had a dissidence based on a vision of the country. Taxing export sectors is not the way. The conditions must be created so that it can export strongly. But we were open to discussing it on the premises. But then why did the Executive withdraw it? It is a decision that should be asked to the Government. The Government sensed that it could lose the chapter on agricultural withholdings, which was probably the most critical axis.
And perhaps he considered that he should not discuss the entire fiscal and tax issue.And he withdraws it, along with the Income Tax Law. To be clear, Argentina needs dialogue, a nation-province dialogue, where balance and fiscal order are taken into account, the issues that the national government needs to stabilize the economy and the provinces also need fiscal and economic predictability. that the national government must guarantee so that the provinces can function. That dialogue seems still pending to me. From what he says, there was room to move forward with the law, except with the withholdings.